Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cGSxW-0005KT-0L for pgsql-committers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 15:56:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cGSxV-0006is-Ar for pgsql-committers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 15:56:09 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cGSxU-0006iS-Ia for pgsql-committers@postgresql.org; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 15:56:08 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cGSxP-00021E-R1 for pgsql-committers@postgresql.org; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 15:56:07 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id uBCFtiCU027834; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 10:55:45 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Peter Eisentraut cc: pgsql-committers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: pgsql: Add support for temporary replication slots In-reply-to: <27274.1481557380@sss.pgh.pa.us> References: <27274.1481557380@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Tom Lane message dated "Mon, 12 Dec 2016 10:43:00 -0500" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <27832.1481558144.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 10:55:44 -0500 Message-ID: <27833.1481558144@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Pg-Spam-Score: -4.9 (----) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-committers Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-committers-owner@postgresql.org I wrote: > Peter Eisentraut writes: >> Add support for temporary replication slots > Some of the slower buildfarm members are failing test-decoding-check since > this went in. At least on prairiedog, it looks like a race condition in > the test: Having now looked a bit more closely, that's almost certainly what it is: the test is assuming that the old backend exits instantaneously, which it doesn't. You might want to borrow the wait-for-previous-session-to-die loop I put into src/test/modules/test_extensions/sql/test_extensions.sql recently. (Make sure you get the fixed version ;-)) regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list (pgsql-committers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers