Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dsiGN-0004sb-Iv for pgsql-committers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 04:29:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dsiGN-00052j-5O for pgsql-committers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 04:29:59 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dsiGM-00052W-Lh; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 04:29:58 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dsiGF-0001qQ-MW; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 04:29:57 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v8F4TmUS028655; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 00:29:48 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Andres Freund cc: Thomas Munro , pgsql-committers Subject: Re: pgsql: Add support for coordinating record typmods among parallel worke In-reply-to: References: <13971.1505445491@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Andres Freund message dated "Thu, 14 Sep 2017 21:11:58 -0700" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <28653.1505449788.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 00:29:48 -0400 Message-ID: <28654.1505449788@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-committers Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-committers-owner@postgresql.org Andres Freund writes: > Sorry for missing that during review - unfortunately I don't have a compu= ter with me now - so I won't get around to this till tomorrow... It turns out that this breaks my local build, too, so I went ahead and pushed a fix. At least two buildfarm members think there's something deeper broken here: 2017-09-15 00:08:34.061 EDT [97092:75] LOG: worker process: parallel worke= r for PID 101175 (PID 101256) was terminated by signal 11: Segmentation fau= lt 2017-09-15 00:08:34.061 EDT [97092:76] DETAIL: Failed process was running:= select * from pg_get_object_address('operator of access method', '{btree,i= nteger_ops,1}', '{int4,bool}'); I wonder if this indicates you forgot to consider transmission of state to parallel worker processes. regards, tom lane --=20 Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list (pgsql-committers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers