From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>,
        pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org,
        Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: pgsql: injection_points: Remove portions related to custom
 pgstats
In-reply-to: <aTZZzFhQTtUKWGLm@paquier.xyz>
References: <E1vSSCn-003N0Z-2i@gemulon.postgresql.org>
 <2899652.1765167313@sss.pgh.pa.us> <aTZZzFhQTtUKWGLm@paquier.xyz>
Comments: In-reply-to Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
	message dated "Mon, 08 Dec 2025 13:53:32 +0900"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <2904426.1765169854.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2025 23:57:34 -0500
Message-ID: <2904427.1765169854@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/2904427.1765169854%40sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
> On Sun, Dec 07, 2025 at 11:15:13PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think that this is really a bug in the Xversion-update test, because
>> I don't see why we'd be holding src/test/modules libraries to the
>> standard of can-be-upgraded-across-versions.  But maybe there's
>> something I'm missing?

> And I was wondering whether I should just plant more items in
> AdjustUpgrade.pm, like in the attached.

Nah, hold off till we have a discussion about whether the test is
correct to expect compatibility.  We can afford to have a couple
of BF animals unhappy for a day or two while we come to a decision.

			regards, tom lane