Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oxAWt-0005eM-IZ for pgsql-committers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 17:24:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oxAWs-00051t-EG for pgsql-committers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 17:24:22 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oxAWs-00050k-6x for pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 17:24:22 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oxAWq-0007lj-88 for pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 17:24:21 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 2ALHOHlu3214377; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 12:24:17 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Andres Freund cc: pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: pgsql: Prevent instability in contrib/pageinspect's regression test. In-reply-to: <20221121172206.h6kywxrzqcmhoqom@awork3.anarazel.de> References: <20221121172206.h6kywxrzqcmhoqom@awork3.anarazel.de> Comments: In-reply-to Andres Freund message dated "Mon, 21 Nov 2022 09:22:06 -0800" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <3214375.1669051457.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 12:24:17 -0500 Message-ID: <3214376.1669051457@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Andres Freund writes: > Looks like a chunk of the buildfarm doesn't like this - presumably becau= se > they use force_parallel_mode =3D regress. Seems ok to just force that to= off in > this test? Ugh ... didn't occur to me to try that. I'll take a look. regards, tom lane