Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nK6Z0-0000a4-Sv for pgsql-committers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 22:44:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nK6Yz-0002Qx-LP for pgsql-committers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 22:44:49 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nK6Yz-0002Qo-Dz for pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 22:44:49 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nK6Yx-0004dX-1e; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 22:44:48 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 21FMiekZ3224285; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 17:44:40 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Andres Freund cc: Thomas Munro , Alvaro Herrera , Fabien COELHO , Thomas Munro , pgsql-committers Subject: Re: pgsql: Track LLVM 15 changes. In-reply-to: <20220215224123.fx2mxkvlbvhk7377@alap3.anarazel.de> References: <202202142122.eqz4mu2ecfes@alvherre.pgsql> <3155481.1644950069@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20220215224123.fx2mxkvlbvhk7377@alap3.anarazel.de> Comments: In-reply-to Andres Freund message dated "Tue, 15 Feb 2022 14:41:23 -0800" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <3224283.1644965080.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 17:44:40 -0500 Message-ID: <3224284.1644965080@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Andres Freund writes: > On 2022-02-16 09:18:53 +1300, Thomas Munro wrote: >> Yeah I mentioned this problem in the other thread. I got as far as >> finding this write-up: >> https://llvm.org/docs/OpaquePointers.html > Given that major parts of llvm (clang alone contains ~1k references) aren't > yet transitioned, I wonder if should silence them for now? For my own part, I don't have any problem with just filtering these warnings for now. I don't need any buildfarm changes for that. regards, tom lane