Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oWt70-0007wo-7B for pgsql-committers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 10 Sep 2022 05:33:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oWt6y-0005sc-85 for pgsql-committers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 10 Sep 2022 05:33:00 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oWt6y-0005sT-10 for pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 10 Sep 2022 05:33:00 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oWt6v-0000K4-3m for pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 10 Sep 2022 05:32:59 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 28A5WqOB338811; Sat, 10 Sep 2022 01:32:52 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Andres Freund cc: Noah Misch , pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: pgsql: aix: No need to use mkldexport when we want to export all symbol In-reply-to: <20220910052741.t7w7csyrggwus2ze@awork3.anarazel.de> References: <325593.1662783266@sss.pgh.pa.us> <89D645BA-FF97-4516-A21D-9FC4A4B31F8C@anarazel.de> <20220910043749.koidc5k4j5dxo3if@awork3.anarazel.de> <20220910052741.t7w7csyrggwus2ze@awork3.anarazel.de> Comments: In-reply-to Andres Freund message dated "Fri, 09 Sep 2022 22:27:41 -0700" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <338809.1662787972.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2022 01:32:52 -0400 Message-ID: <338810.1662787972@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Andres Freund writes: > It seem worth applying the -qvisibility patch and seeing whether that fixes > the buildfarm? Worth a try. > I guess alternatively we could revert the mkldexport patch, > apply the -qvisibility patch and then apply the mkldexport thing again > afterwards? Seems pretty academic, unless -qvisibility doesn't fix it. regards, tom lane