Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ncaB9-0006Dn-CK for pgsql-committers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2022 22:00:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ncaB8-0001QX-7c for pgsql-committers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2022 22:00:34 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ncaB8-0001QK-11 for pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2022 22:00:34 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ncaB5-00033g-Qt for pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2022 22:00:32 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 237M0Tlw3494464; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 18:00:29 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Alvaro Herrera cc: pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: pgsql: Rewrite some RI code to avoid using SPI In-reply-to: <202204072134.sou3laebxj7c@alvherre.pgsql> References: <202204072134.sou3laebxj7c@alvherre.pgsql> Comments: In-reply-to Alvaro Herrera message dated "Thu, 07 Apr 2022 23:34:03 +0200" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <3494462.1649368829.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2022 18:00:29 -0400 Message-ID: <3494463.1649368829@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Alvaro Herrera writes: > On 2022-Apr-07, Tom Lane wrote: >> (1) We've added enough instability to the tree this week already. > Several animals failed already in ways that look obviously connected to > this commit, so I can't disagree: Yeah, I saw that after complaining. Looks like all and only the 32-bit animals were unhappy. Something we'll want to run to ground when there's less time pressure. regards, tom lane