Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ky8q2-0007nu-Sj for pgsql-committers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2021 07:39:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ky8q1-0004DA-0H for pgsql-committers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2021 07:39:05 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ky8q0-0004D3-R6 for pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2021 07:39:04 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ky8pz-0008TA-4S for pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2021 07:39:04 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 1097cxKe368455; Sat, 9 Jan 2021 02:38:59 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Amit Kapila cc: pgsql-committers Subject: Re: pgsql: Test decoding of two-phase transactions during the build of a co In-reply-to: References: <363512.1610171267@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Amit Kapila message dated "Sat, 09 Jan 2021 12:59:34 +0530" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <368453.1610177939.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2021 02:38:59 -0500 Message-ID: <368454.1610177939@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Amit Kapila writes: > I think I know whats going on here. I have responded to the thread on > pgsql-hackers [1]. Ah, yeah, the autovacuum theory fits the facts: chipmunk is pretty slow, and it's not failed 100% of the time. regards, tom lane