Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1qtqkZ-00EDMR-Vh for pgsql-committers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2023 14:45:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1qtqkY-002zty-1Z for pgsql-committers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2023 14:45:18 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1qtqkX-002ztK-QZ for pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2023 14:45:18 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1qtqkU-001k3P-DD; Fri, 20 Oct 2023 14:45:17 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 39KEjDRp3769410; Fri, 20 Oct 2023 10:45:13 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Thomas Munro cc: pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: pgsql: jit: Support opaque pointers in LLVM 16. In-reply-to: References: Comments: In-reply-to Thomas Munro message dated "Wed, 18 Oct 2023 10:33:25 -0000" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <3769408.1697813113.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2023 10:45:13 -0400 Message-ID: <3769409.1697813113@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Thomas Munro writes: > jit: Support opaque pointers in LLVM 16. I chanced to notice that the configure script (and meson too) is still doing PGAC_PROG_VARCC_VARFLAGS_OPT(CLANG, BITCODE_CFLAGS, [-Xclang -no-opaque-= pointers]) PGAC_PROG_VARCXX_VARFLAGS_OPT(CLANGXX, BITCODE_CXXFLAGS, [-Xclang -no-op= aque-pointers]) Shouldn't we remove that now? regards, tom lane