Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rSITQ-00Cl2I-VN for pgsql-committers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 15:14:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rSITP-00DfHE-K9 for pgsql-committers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 15:13:59 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rSITP-00DfH6-D9 for pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 15:13:59 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rSITM-002yft-NQ for pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 15:13:58 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 40NFDrcW4029763; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 10:13:53 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Peter Eisentraut cc: pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: pgsql: Generate syscache info from catalog files In-reply-to: <4020891.1706018887@sss.pgh.pa.us> References: <4020891.1706018887@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Tom Lane message dated "Tue, 23 Jan 2024 09:08:07 -0500" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <4029761.1706022833.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 10:13:53 -0500 Message-ID: <4029762.1706022833@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk I wrote: > Peter Eisentraut writes: >> Generate syscache info from catalog files > Per guaibasaurus[1], this commit broke "make dist": > ... > I'm not sure why --- the makefile changes treat these new files > exactly like other generated files. It doesn't repro here, > either, which is odd. It looks like a timing problem, but how > could there be one? Even odder: I did a test tarball build, and that worked too. That runs on the very same VM as guaibasaurus, so what the heck? regards, tom lane