From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
cc: pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Generate syscache info from catalog files
In-reply-to: <d428972e-cb82-4dd8-ba2e-5f695c020752@eisentraut.org>
References: <E1rSAY2-002hIk-4y@gemulon.postgresql.org>
 <4020891.1706018887@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <d428972e-cb82-4dd8-ba2e-5f695c020752@eisentraut.org>
Comments: In-reply-to Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
	message dated "Tue, 23 Jan 2024 16:31:14 +0100"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <4049174.1706027790.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 11:36:30 -0500
Message-ID: <4049175.1706027790@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/4049175.1706027790%40sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> writes:
> On 23.01.24 15:08, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Per guaibasaurus[1], this commit broke "make dist":
>> I'm not sure why --- the makefile changes treat these new files
>> exactly like other generated files.  It doesn't repro here,
>> either, which is odd.  It looks like a timing problem, but how
>> could there be one?

> I have found that the files are not listed in the clean target in 
> src/include/Makefile.  That might explain it, but it's gotta be fixed 
> anyway.  I'll go ahead with that.

Looks like that made guaibasaurus happy, but I'm still mystified
as to what was wrong and why it didn't repro elsewhere.

			regards, tom lane