From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
cc: Amit Kapila <akapila@postgresql.org>,
        PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: pgsql: Remove unused wait events.
In-reply-to: 
 <CA+TgmoZ2W5Pqq19kzN5K-Boveq0u1v5az7wFJcUhHdZ18aw7_A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <E1mdOBY-0005j2-QL@gemulon.postgresql.org>
 <CA+TgmoYSAsxiHqpyDCzJa2-hYv0Sme7Me1esi6sHG6LbY8KD+w@mail.gmail.com>
 <4047667.1635179918@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CA+TgmoZ2W5Pqq19kzN5K-Boveq0u1v5az7wFJcUhHdZ18aw7_A@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
	message dated "Mon, 25 Oct 2021 13:10:25 -0400"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <4050628.1635182306.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 13:18:26 -0400
Message-ID: <4050629.1635182306@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/4050629.1635182306%40sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> ... But while I agree it's good to remove unused stuff in the
> master, it doesn't seem like we really need to back-patch it.

Yeah, exactly.  I don't see any benefit that's commensurate with
even a small risk of breaking extensions --- and apparently, in
this case that's not a risk but a certainty.

			regards, tom lane