Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eWu9f-00085w-Jy for pgsql-committers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2018 01:17:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eWu9f-0001P3-7E for pgsql-committers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2018 01:17:11 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eWu9e-0001Ot-Vf for pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2018 01:17:11 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eWu9c-0001t1-NP for pgsql-committers@postgresql.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2018 01:17:09 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w041H4QV005188; Wed, 3 Jan 2018 20:17:04 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Thomas Munro cc: Andres Freund , pgsql-committers Subject: Re: pgsql: Add parallel-aware hash joins. In-reply-to: <18804.1515002619@sss.pgh.pa.us> References: <20171221092940.gbxcszbzsr5khsfr@alap3.anarazel.de> <20171221095550.d3e7xhoakcowhu5b@alap3.anarazel.de> <20171222082203.fl6rpzlqnm4h7h6h@alap3.anarazel.de> <30219.1514428346@sss.pgh.pa.us> <30655.1514673257@sss.pgh.pa.us> <4001.1514678419@sss.pgh.pa.us> <18190.1514943510@sss.pgh.pa.us> <18804.1515002619@sss.pgh.! pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Tom Lane message dated "Wed, 03 Jan 2018 13:03:39 -0500" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <5186.1515028624.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2018 20:17:04 -0500 Message-ID: <5187.1515028624@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk So this patch has been in place for two weeks, the buildfarm has still got the measles, and we're entering the January commitfest with a lot of other work to get done. I realize that the two weeks were mostly holiday time, but it's time to have some urgency about clearing the buildfarm failures. As best I understand, the remaining failures simply arise from an unstable regression test case and aren't teaching us anything of value. I propose that for the moment, we simply remove the failing query from join.sql. We can put it back when there's reason to think it will pass everywhere. regards, tom lane