Message-ID: <5187D3EA.6010802@dunslane.net>
Date: Mon, 06 May 2013 12:01:46 -0400
From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
	rv:15.0) Gecko/20120827 Thunderbird/15.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
CC: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, pgsql-committers@postgresql.org,
	remi_zara@mac.com
Subject: Re: pgsql: Translation updates
References: <E1UZBZ3-0004kd-R7@gemulon.postgresql.org>
	<12992.1367847205@sss.pgh.pa.us> <5187C5E4.7020700@gmx.net>
	<15332.1367852721@sss.pgh.pa.us>
In-Reply-To: <15332.1367852721@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-committers-owner@postgresql.org


On 05/06/2013 11:05 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
>> On 5/6/13 9:33 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> It looks like several of the buildfarm members have problems with this
>>> commit.  I'm seeing failures like
>> The failures are all the same NetBSD installation.  It's probably
>> running a very old gettext installation.  It might be useful to know
>> which version that is.
> Some of the Windows machines are showing the same failure, though for
> them it seems to show up as an "install" not "make" failure.
>
> 			

Yes, because there are differences in the sequence of events between 
normal and MSVC builds.

But regardless of what the version is, should we really be imposing a 
new build tool version requirement at this stage of the cycle?

cheers

andrew


-- 
Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list (pgsql-committers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers