Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1j09Ft-0007gI-2I for pgsql-committers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2020 19:25:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1j09Fr-0000t1-Oe for pgsql-committers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2020 19:25:31 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1j09Fr-0000su-HO for pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2020 19:25:31 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1j09Fp-0004Ig-8l; Fri, 07 Feb 2020 19:25:31 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 017JPRRf005262; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 14:25:27 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Fujii Masao cc: pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: pgsql: Fix bug in Tid scan. In-reply-to: References: Comments: In-reply-to Fujii Masao message dated "Fri, 07 Feb 2020 13:08:15 +0000" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <5260.1581103527.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2020 14:25:27 -0500 Message-ID: <5261.1581103527@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Fujii Masao writes: > Fix bug in Tid scan. AFAICS, this patch has caused an ABI break in v12. Do we really believe that no extension references the values of the ScanOptions enum? regards, tom lane