Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y0gag-0002UT-Ka for pgsql-committers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 01:06:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y0gag-0000rX-4g for pgsql-committers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 01:06:18 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y0gYh-0000DP-Bx for pgsql-committers@postgresql.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 01:04:15 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y0gYa-0005K3-GK for pgsql-committers@postgresql.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 01:04:13 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id sBG13xss005611; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 20:03:59 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Alvaro Herrera cc: Euler Taveira , Andrew Dunstan , Peter Eisentraut , pgsql-committers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: pgsql: Translation updates In-reply-to: <24946.1418689519@sss.pgh.pa.us> References: <548EDD34.4060806@timbira.com.br> <548F047E.4010900@gmx.net> <548F0A57.4040105@timbira.com.br> <548F4FEF.3000508@gmx.net> <548F5299.4080500@timbira.com.br> <20141215220412.GP1768@alvh.no-ip.org> <20141215223307.GQ1768@alvh.no-ip.org> <24946.1418689519@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Tom Lane message dated "Mon, 15 Dec 2014 19:25:19 -0500" Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 20:03:59 -0500 Message-ID: <5610.1418691839@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-committers Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-committers-owner@postgresql.org I wrote: > However, things are definitely a lot closer than they were before, > and I think at this point the risk-reward ratio of fooling with it > anymore is not attractive. I'm going to wrap what we have, as soon > as I see a few more buildfarm critters give it a green light. Which, I just realized, they are not doing because the buildfarm script intentionally ignores updates to .po files (and .doc too). This is probably too clever by half. In the meantime, though, I have little alternative but to cross my fingers and wrap. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list (pgsql-committers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers