Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1x6rwE-000URd-0C for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2026 15:52:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1x6rwD-008PxQ-1Z for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2026 15:52:45 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1x6rwD-008PxD-0h for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2026 15:52:45 +0000 Received: from smtp.outgoing.loopia.se ([93.188.3.37]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1x6rw9-00000000pMZ-3pPQ for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2026 15:52:44 +0000 Received: from s807.loopia.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by s807.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AD3777C0B2 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2026 17:52:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from s979.loopia.se (unknown [172.22.191.6]) by s807.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C04177C759; Wed, 16 Sep 2026 17:52:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (unknown [172.22.191.5]) by s979.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49D4D10BC460; Wed, 16 Sep 2026 17:52:42 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at amavis.loopia.se X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 tagged_above=-999 required=6.2 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: s474.loopia.se (amavis); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yesql.se Received: from s981.loopia.se ([172.22.191.5]) by localhost (s474.loopia.se [172.22.190.14]) (amavis, port 10024) with LMTP id SuOPFf7SNz4V; Wed, 16 Sep 2026 17:52:42 +0200 (CEST) X-Loopia-Auth: user X-Loopia-User: daniel@yesql.se X-Loopia-Originating-IP: 89.255.232.236 Received: from smtpclient.apple (customer-89-255-232-236.stosn.net [89.255.232.236]) (Authenticated sender: daniel@yesql.se) by s981.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BB95822B165D; Wed, 16 Sep 2026 17:52:41 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yesql.se; s=loopiadkim1707475645; t=1789573961; bh=iPhh399uVxAzq35lW4bdtCW/IvAZU/BcjkSpgCwPf14=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=NberN3hK90knCnq2NMzrdRTXmeg1K9W028iuNZeT7vm92ViXPO3AmTKjB+rmyA7l2 wMB35PQSvHc25B4fKTSIVWgykrGAM/mMlZs6GLLQEr3akkjxf6X6ZjY6qEt5ccu/bQ ARHMGFpABiBsnqlGWX0CiBnxQMK8Yp0LQsnYtKckGJ+LhVq05k1LSr4N/okokMTyRq uZdLgszuVxmcFVpcMgOJdLZy+WDwUawlOKhVtPMpaum5s7+QxcDdgXomHlO02WeXqw Xq/ByzkeQmxosTM+dtFGwYHzL/cvgB/UsAvN5OSN4PWhcLIo2PMeHK2JxAGIziAbdK P0+y3IRAA4Nrw== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3776.700.51.11.12\)) Subject: Re: pgsql: Revert online data checksum transitions From: Daniel Gustafsson In-Reply-To: <994b40a1-af72-45d9-bfd1-9f0f4b0e9715@iki.fi> Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2026 17:52:31 +0200 Cc: Manuel Reyes Bravo , Aleksander Alekseev , PostgreSQL Hackers , Masao Fujii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <6F3323A2-AC5B-49F1-BF9B-DAC73F91645B@yesql.se> References: <1EEAFCFB-15DB-4EC1-BD49-964C799A01B2@yesql.se> <0FF8445C-7912-4973-94B6-936B804AC840@yesql.se> <994b40a1-af72-45d9-bfd1-9f0f4b0e9715@iki.fi> To: Heikki Linnakangas X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3776.700.51.11.12) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk > On 16 Sep 2026, at 16:08, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: >=20 > On 16/09/2026 16:04, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: >>> On 16 Sep 2026, at 14:58, Manuel Reyes Bravo = wrote: >>> The server itself is not at risk, since PG_CONTROL_VERSION was = bumped >>> and 19.0 refuses a beta3 data directory; it is only tools reading >>> archived beta3 WAL that cannot tell the formats apart. But the = revert >>> of 0d3dba38c77 on this branch (01a80f06214) bumped the magic for the >>> same reason, so it looks like this one should too. >> Thanks for the report, will include when fixing. >=20 > Also, the ControlFile->data_checksum_version_init is now never set. This patch is as difficult to back out as it was to get in. I've been = trying to save a few small generic checksum bugfixes from the revert but that = also made it a lot more complicated. Will fix this one as well in the = follow-up fixup I have staged for later today. -- Daniel Gustafsson