Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1j8pAb-0006wh-PP for pgsql-committers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 17:47:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1j8pAY-0001ij-N5 for pgsql-committers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 17:47:54 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1j8pAY-0001i8-FZ for pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 17:47:54 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1j8pAV-0000dJ-1l for pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 17:47:53 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 022HlkQ6007972; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 12:47:47 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Peter Geoghegan cc: pgsql-committers Subject: Re: pgsql: Add deduplication to nbtree. In-reply-to: References: <27003.1583087095@sss.pgh.pa.us> <29676.1583090977@sss.pgh.pa.us> <5838.1583100843@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1640.1583121984@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Peter Geoghegan message dated "Mon, 02 Mar 2020 08:08:11 -0800" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <7970.1583171266.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2020 12:47:46 -0500 Message-ID: <7971.1583171266@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Another issue I just noticed is that src/tools/pginclude/cpluspluscheck complains thusly: ./src/include/access/nbtree.h: In function 'void BTreeTupleSetPosting(Inde= xTupleData*, int, int)': ./src/include/access/nbtree.h:384: warning: comparison between signed and = unsigned integer expressions I suppose this can be silenced with an appropriate cast, and doing so would seem like a good idea. regards, tom lane