Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1i7RmI-0000vO-N7 for pgsql-committers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 09 Sep 2019 22:04:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1i7RmH-0000tC-Il for pgsql-committers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 09 Sep 2019 22:04:53 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1i7RmH-0000ph-AM for pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 09 Sep 2019 22:04:53 +0000 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1i7RmE-00053n-Mb for pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 09 Sep 2019 22:04:52 +0000 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90C2F22206; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 18:04:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 09 Sep 2019 18:04:49 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=anarazel.de; h= date:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:subject:to:cc:from:message-id; s=fm2; bh=6HzR98en+iJ2/fwbjerRaBn/x+31RQtmAm37Va1BVe8=; b=W0jKicmwUXEP D4Qpl/1g1FFwgpxSItd8pX2xk4yS3mFJztorG8o1gsVvfpnf/z7jU2xEKzlQZztj lPqSWXWwrwl9zhnvkBCMZxytyCmVwBl+IXfp1Astv1C6ctCK6/NMG7MJJwQ3Yxz0 KfZcKVaSci37kheBQBjxDaFHd6L033D6XN+HkCdHhRxiHsM1KYGghKx2Bi7Fzhew 1xt2OUYW8w7uaH4TzXv4c88a0NQ+xzjVQK4eEBpmxi34Z3b2qhAW4q+dStME6riL ffxTc40XqSOhDvhHv9zO93Y/VPn6YVOHVpO2e7JKWoaCO1hRyF6hDfvpOQn3yvuI 7W/TllUCdA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=6HzR98en+iJ2/fwbjerRaBn/x+31RQtmAm37Va1BV e8=; b=kF+zor00VAkI7W4swZg16ts/ayxiMSDPs75vW+L1Z6++DNURMt0xNHZOD HK/YdMpAH0K9uqfXUlmb7gBzHLaB1DP+ZtmpOuHIWphUG2465IoxYOKf6jSDunwp 8+i/EhIv0yx4iJZonya/K0PkdQFrATXuHL36ic4rxkOAQZXtrvYoSmmzhGtd2MCX JVfOyTaVI8ydQu5ZTRv4A536HcmLr+BXJQrS6skxYjTWTwozEqst/dhuMZlte2UD 0w7nElegv4wXJ1W/PPJu6GhhsOu5zf7f4LbW9bexN8BlcfGTwUt0ohZJesfs1WX1 VNw4DR0a6eS3Ctre0GCQDgHQtBOsQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduvddrudekjedgtddvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepffgfjghfgggtgffuvffhkfesthhqmhdttderjeenucfhrhhomheptehnughr vghsucfhrhgvuhhnugcuoegrnhgurhgvshesrghnrghrrgiivghlrdguvgeqnecuffhomh grihhnpehpohhsthhgrhgvshhqlhdrohhrghenucfkphepudegkedrieelrdekhedrfeek necurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegrnhgurhgvshesrghnrghrrgiivghlrdguvg enucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt X-ME-Proxy: Received: from [192.168.6.181] (unknown [148.69.85.38]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C5C5A8005B; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 18:04:48 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2019 23:04:47 +0100 User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: <7216.1568066488@sss.pgh.pa.us> References: <7216.1568066488@sss.pgh.pa.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: pgsql: Reorder EPQ work, to fix rowmark related bugs and improve effici To: Tom Lane CC: pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org,Thomas Munro From: Andres Freund Message-ID: List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Hi, On September 9, 2019 11:01:28 PM GMT+01:00, Tom Lane wrote: >Andres Freund writes: >> On September 9, 2019 10:51:26 PM GMT+01:00, Thomas Munro > wrote: >>> On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 12:32 AM Andres Freund >>> Did this cause the following failure in eval-plan-qual on >>> REL_12_STABLE? >>> >https://buildfarm=2Epostgresql=2Eorg/cgi-bin/show_log=2Epl?nm=3Dprairiedo= g&dt=3D2019-09-09%2019%3A08%3A41 > >Just saw that :-( > >> Argh, yes, probably=2E But it's just isolationtester I think, not a >backed bug=2E Need to backport the recent fix in master to at least 12=2E >> Tom, do you think we should backpatch both the order fix and the >notice improvement, or just the former? And to which version? > >I think the first question is why is only prairiedog showing this=2E We only saw the similar failure on master on a very small number of machin= es as well=2E Given The somewhat unusual way packets have to go out to be l= ikely to be problematic, that's not too surprising=2E >Let's not panic until we understand that=2E If it's the packet ordering thing in isolationtester, then I think there's= no need to panic, personally=2E And the output does look a lot like that= =2E >prairiedog looks to be about 20 minutes away from finishing the >isolation tests for master, so that will be a useful data point >as to whether there's any 12/HEAD difference=2E I'll dig deeper >as soon as that run finishes=2E Cool=2E Andres --=20 Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail=2E Please excuse my brevity=2E