public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Andres Freund <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: pgsql: smgr: Hold interrupts in most smgr functions
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 21:37:00 +0000
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
smgr: Hold interrupts in most smgr functions
We need to hold interrupts across most of the smgr.c/md.c functions, as
otherwise interrupt processing, e.g. due to a < ERROR elog/ereport, can
trigger procsignal processing, which in turn can trigger smgrreleaseall(). As
the relevant code is not reentrant, we quickly end up in a bad situation.
The only reason we haven't noticed this before is that there is only one
non-error ereport called in affected routines, in register_dirty_segments(),
and that one is extremely rarely reached. If one enables fd.c's FDDEBUG it's
easy to reproduce crashes.
It seems better to put the HOLD_INTERRUPTS()/RESUME_INTERRUPTS() in smgr.c,
instead of trying to push them down to md.c where possible: For one, every
smgr implementation would be vulnerable, for another, a good bit of smgr.c
code itself is affected too.
Eventually we might want a more targeted solution, allowing e.g. a networked
smgr implementation to be interrupted, but many other, more complicated,
problems would need to be fixed for that to be viable (e.g. smgr.c is often
called with interrupts already held).
One could argue this should be backpatched, but the existing < ERROR
elog/ereports that can be reached with unmodified sources are unlikely to be
reached. On balance the risk of backpatching seems higher than the gain - at
least for now.
Reviewed-by: Noah Misch <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Munro <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3vae7l5ozvqtxmd7rr7zaeq3qkuipz365u3rtim5t5wdkr6f4g@vkgf2fogjirl
Branch
------
master
Details
-------
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/fc51a60dd45bb39d21d09a890da2f21ac8e61532
Modified Files
--------------
src/backend/storage/smgr/smgr.c | 104 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 101 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: pgsql: smgr: Hold interrupts in most smgr functions
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox