pg.ddx.io  pgsql-committers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
pgsql: Use SnapshotDirty when checking for conflicting index names.
6+ messages / 1 participants
[nested] [flat]

* pgsql: Use SnapshotDirty when checking for conflicting index names.
@ 2025-06-20 17:42 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread

From: Tom Lane @ 2025-06-20 17:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org

Use SnapshotDirty when checking for conflicting index names.

While choosing an autogenerated name for an index, look for
pre-existing relations using a SnapshotDirty snapshot, instead of the
previous behavior that considered only committed-good pg_class rows.
This allows us to detect and avoid conflicts against indexes that are
still being built.

It's still possible to fail due to a race condition, but the window
is now just the amount of time that it takes DefineIndex to validate
all its parameters, call smgrcreate(), and enter the index's pg_class
row.  Formerly the race window covered the entire time needed to
create and fill an index, which could be very long if the table is
large.  Worse, if the conflicting index creation is part of a larger
transaction, it wouldn't be visible till COMMIT.

So this isn't a complete solution, but it should greatly ameliorate
the problem, and the patch is simple enough to be back-patchable.

It might at some point be useful to do the same for pg_constraint
entries (cf. ChooseConstraintName, ConstraintNameExists, and related
functions).  However, in the absence of field complaints, I'll leave
that alone for now.  The relation-name test should be good enough for
index-based constraints, while foreign-key constraints seem to be okay
since they require exclusive locks to create.

Bug: #18959
Reported-by: Maximilian Chrzan <maximilian.chrzan@here.com>
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18959-f63b53b864bb1417@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 13

Branch
------
master

Details
-------
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/5861b1f343b52ac358912707788214fb8dc981e5

Modified Files
--------------
src/backend/commands/indexcmds.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 6+ messages in thread

* pgsql: Use SnapshotDirty when checking for conflicting index names.
@ 2025-06-20 17:42 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread

From: Tom Lane @ 2025-06-20 17:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org

Use SnapshotDirty when checking for conflicting index names.

While choosing an autogenerated name for an index, look for
pre-existing relations using a SnapshotDirty snapshot, instead of the
previous behavior that considered only committed-good pg_class rows.
This allows us to detect and avoid conflicts against indexes that are
still being built.

It's still possible to fail due to a race condition, but the window
is now just the amount of time that it takes DefineIndex to validate
all its parameters, call smgrcreate(), and enter the index's pg_class
row.  Formerly the race window covered the entire time needed to
create and fill an index, which could be very long if the table is
large.  Worse, if the conflicting index creation is part of a larger
transaction, it wouldn't be visible till COMMIT.

So this isn't a complete solution, but it should greatly ameliorate
the problem, and the patch is simple enough to be back-patchable.

It might at some point be useful to do the same for pg_constraint
entries (cf. ChooseConstraintName, ConstraintNameExists, and related
functions).  However, in the absence of field complaints, I'll leave
that alone for now.  The relation-name test should be good enough for
index-based constraints, while foreign-key constraints seem to be okay
since they require exclusive locks to create.

Bug: #18959
Reported-by: Maximilian Chrzan <maximilian.chrzan@here.com>
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18959-f63b53b864bb1417@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 13

Branch
------
REL_17_STABLE

Details
-------
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/fdd82692230a4ffcc6c382a68401dd8c1bed8250

Modified Files
--------------
src/backend/commands/indexcmds.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 6+ messages in thread

* pgsql: Use SnapshotDirty when checking for conflicting index names.
@ 2025-06-20 17:42 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread

From: Tom Lane @ 2025-06-20 17:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org

Use SnapshotDirty when checking for conflicting index names.

While choosing an autogenerated name for an index, look for
pre-existing relations using a SnapshotDirty snapshot, instead of the
previous behavior that considered only committed-good pg_class rows.
This allows us to detect and avoid conflicts against indexes that are
still being built.

It's still possible to fail due to a race condition, but the window
is now just the amount of time that it takes DefineIndex to validate
all its parameters, call smgrcreate(), and enter the index's pg_class
row.  Formerly the race window covered the entire time needed to
create and fill an index, which could be very long if the table is
large.  Worse, if the conflicting index creation is part of a larger
transaction, it wouldn't be visible till COMMIT.

So this isn't a complete solution, but it should greatly ameliorate
the problem, and the patch is simple enough to be back-patchable.

It might at some point be useful to do the same for pg_constraint
entries (cf. ChooseConstraintName, ConstraintNameExists, and related
functions).  However, in the absence of field complaints, I'll leave
that alone for now.  The relation-name test should be good enough for
index-based constraints, while foreign-key constraints seem to be okay
since they require exclusive locks to create.

Bug: #18959
Reported-by: Maximilian Chrzan <maximilian.chrzan@here.com>
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18959-f63b53b864bb1417@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 13

Branch
------
REL_16_STABLE

Details
-------
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/1e24ea1603505142f63dcc8e7dbbb120312e2fe5

Modified Files
--------------
src/backend/commands/indexcmds.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 6+ messages in thread

* pgsql: Use SnapshotDirty when checking for conflicting index names.
@ 2025-06-20 17:42 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread

From: Tom Lane @ 2025-06-20 17:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org

Use SnapshotDirty when checking for conflicting index names.

While choosing an autogenerated name for an index, look for
pre-existing relations using a SnapshotDirty snapshot, instead of the
previous behavior that considered only committed-good pg_class rows.
This allows us to detect and avoid conflicts against indexes that are
still being built.

It's still possible to fail due to a race condition, but the window
is now just the amount of time that it takes DefineIndex to validate
all its parameters, call smgrcreate(), and enter the index's pg_class
row.  Formerly the race window covered the entire time needed to
create and fill an index, which could be very long if the table is
large.  Worse, if the conflicting index creation is part of a larger
transaction, it wouldn't be visible till COMMIT.

So this isn't a complete solution, but it should greatly ameliorate
the problem, and the patch is simple enough to be back-patchable.

It might at some point be useful to do the same for pg_constraint
entries (cf. ChooseConstraintName, ConstraintNameExists, and related
functions).  However, in the absence of field complaints, I'll leave
that alone for now.  The relation-name test should be good enough for
index-based constraints, while foreign-key constraints seem to be okay
since they require exclusive locks to create.

Bug: #18959
Reported-by: Maximilian Chrzan <maximilian.chrzan@here.com>
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18959-f63b53b864bb1417@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 13

Branch
------
REL_15_STABLE

Details
-------
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/75b8982eae78f930cc8c1c48cd2d9dc03113d92b

Modified Files
--------------
src/backend/commands/indexcmds.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 6+ messages in thread

* pgsql: Use SnapshotDirty when checking for conflicting index names.
@ 2025-06-20 17:42 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread

From: Tom Lane @ 2025-06-20 17:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org

Use SnapshotDirty when checking for conflicting index names.

While choosing an autogenerated name for an index, look for
pre-existing relations using a SnapshotDirty snapshot, instead of the
previous behavior that considered only committed-good pg_class rows.
This allows us to detect and avoid conflicts against indexes that are
still being built.

It's still possible to fail due to a race condition, but the window
is now just the amount of time that it takes DefineIndex to validate
all its parameters, call smgrcreate(), and enter the index's pg_class
row.  Formerly the race window covered the entire time needed to
create and fill an index, which could be very long if the table is
large.  Worse, if the conflicting index creation is part of a larger
transaction, it wouldn't be visible till COMMIT.

So this isn't a complete solution, but it should greatly ameliorate
the problem, and the patch is simple enough to be back-patchable.

It might at some point be useful to do the same for pg_constraint
entries (cf. ChooseConstraintName, ConstraintNameExists, and related
functions).  However, in the absence of field complaints, I'll leave
that alone for now.  The relation-name test should be good enough for
index-based constraints, while foreign-key constraints seem to be okay
since they require exclusive locks to create.

Bug: #18959
Reported-by: Maximilian Chrzan <maximilian.chrzan@here.com>
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18959-f63b53b864bb1417@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 13

Branch
------
REL_14_STABLE

Details
-------
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/27af8b9be8c05d96d4e8207a93230ef0412bf149

Modified Files
--------------
src/backend/commands/indexcmds.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 6+ messages in thread

* pgsql: Use SnapshotDirty when checking for conflicting index names.
@ 2025-06-20 17:42 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread

From: Tom Lane @ 2025-06-20 17:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org

Use SnapshotDirty when checking for conflicting index names.

While choosing an autogenerated name for an index, look for
pre-existing relations using a SnapshotDirty snapshot, instead of the
previous behavior that considered only committed-good pg_class rows.
This allows us to detect and avoid conflicts against indexes that are
still being built.

It's still possible to fail due to a race condition, but the window
is now just the amount of time that it takes DefineIndex to validate
all its parameters, call smgrcreate(), and enter the index's pg_class
row.  Formerly the race window covered the entire time needed to
create and fill an index, which could be very long if the table is
large.  Worse, if the conflicting index creation is part of a larger
transaction, it wouldn't be visible till COMMIT.

So this isn't a complete solution, but it should greatly ameliorate
the problem, and the patch is simple enough to be back-patchable.

It might at some point be useful to do the same for pg_constraint
entries (cf. ChooseConstraintName, ConstraintNameExists, and related
functions).  However, in the absence of field complaints, I'll leave
that alone for now.  The relation-name test should be good enough for
index-based constraints, while foreign-key constraints seem to be okay
since they require exclusive locks to create.

Bug: #18959
Reported-by: Maximilian Chrzan <maximilian.chrzan@here.com>
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18959-f63b53b864bb1417@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 13

Branch
------
REL_13_STABLE

Details
-------
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/4b66cb18879edd7c9dc89c99e6c7c5c2cd074c70

Modified Files
--------------
src/backend/commands/indexcmds.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 6+ messages in thread


end of thread, other threads:[~2025-06-20 17:42 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-06-20 17:42 pgsql: Use SnapshotDirty when checking for conflicting index names. Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
2025-06-20 17:42 pgsql: Use SnapshotDirty when checking for conflicting index names. Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
2025-06-20 17:42 pgsql: Use SnapshotDirty when checking for conflicting index names. Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
2025-06-20 17:42 pgsql: Use SnapshotDirty when checking for conflicting index names. Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
2025-06-20 17:42 pgsql: Use SnapshotDirty when checking for conflicting index names. Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
2025-06-20 17:42 pgsql: Use SnapshotDirty when checking for conflicting index names. Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox