Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mfB8E-0001Xt-8Q for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 01:20:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mfB8D-0006Qf-6d for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 01:20:01 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mfB8C-0006QW-UH for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 01:20:00 +0000 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mfB8A-0008G3-EI for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 01:20:00 +0000 Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28C045C031A; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 21:19:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 25 Oct 2021 21:19:57 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=paquier.xyz; h= date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm3; bh=gISNvhNznHXDTlN0viFIiuCLEb3 XR0DxpKUkiWghZVM=; b=KTcF3O4hkBZCKbsc/AmzmGSj1tngubG9ZE3L0yWLcHg 257itAyRXkV0eGmcF3ui6wUmvNmbB9HJRtptypp8iCJ4OIo3YdNqJsVF4MdCjxCg I7ggIKZ0DZnBIniTQguAzsC4aAfP4tbdeOTzEswyFgjnDdSOedPNJ2R+FZMkaO+v tBKjWyf4/c4JPp4JhjvO2fhTZpBi/QWoiDNp6PiybOlYeJFuZk+q1NlXlbIev1zV 7weqEITK6zOCFYYxv6icGU7n1YhHbkKliIzArvosMY3EFlAxIONHaffSjYSgsVHN rA2AjxL3xtEsNK/hGQZrH1GmWSUBBhGjtElna8NonVQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=gISNvh NznHXDTlN0viFIiuCLEb3XR0DxpKUkiWghZVM=; b=k+igkZn7KhhDRltwrbbMRO wJka67kgI3OXp5GdQnNm8V+BjqG2L0Iz1toQnkBDzC8knrFWSqwQQ6NAucCcfzUJ DCewjLhYesae/YFV8vh1xpg6fyaONiaPaMmopYzg1rMCK/os0w+vrPKtB3P9D7HW k/HOH+8DFYZt6PIhVUNW+6xQxhtsrTV6MwAJIzn8j/OXuI7KIWyJ8LrOWreq0BvV bgsmorjrbtRLsZvaFwNCpkZx3f9O355aMHRMiOJLnXHMxZ3ZePWac+SezaeNPsL0 nrFwj0h+Z0dA0/y9TqlG2/ThM/8X9Mh7iHpAIEjO1lwBJbGxhuUSn4pfjfjuzN3Q == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrvdefiedgfeejucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne gfrhhlucfvnfffucdlfeehmdenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesghdtreertddt vdenucfhrhhomhepofhitghhrggvlhcurfgrqhhuihgvrhcuoehmihgthhgrvghlsehprg hquhhivghrrdighiiiqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedvgeduuefhtdeuleettdevjeeh heeiveeuieegleetgeeljeelieeuieehgeevhfenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtne curfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmihgthhgrvghlsehprghquhhivghrrdighiii X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 21:19:54 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 10:19:53 +0900 From: Michael Paquier To: Tom Lane Cc: Robert Haas , Amit Kapila , PostgreSQL Hackers Subject: Re: pgsql: Remove unused wait events. Message-ID: References: <4047667.1635179918@sss.pgh.pa.us> <4050629.1635182306@sss.pgh.pa.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="b36UU2ifwS1xeww6" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4050629.1635182306@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk --b36UU2ifwS1xeww6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 01:18:26PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Haas writes: >> ... But while I agree it's good to remove unused stuff in the >> master, it doesn't seem like we really need to back-patch it. >=20 > Yeah, exactly. I don't see any benefit that's commensurate with > even a small risk of breaking extensions --- and apparently, in > this case that's not a risk but a certainty. +1. -- Michael --b36UU2ifwS1xeww6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEG72nH6vTowiyblFKnvQgOdbyQH0FAmF3V7gACgkQnvQgOdby QH0l3w/8Dq8+ROt7ss3iflGD7EKWmbMntPCOU9oB6oXGetEjBUDVUHi1yRYVM3Co sVfHGWZboANqFVsF9haSfNS0D/f5NJmSp0sOihxTzIgu6I4TPWQxH5JVdqIOQA5u Ucd40BYiOpZP6vnd5A/goOr4XHkgTi6LSm0kmAxF4gZPzX4RbFsPdgX7k3OxX5VA 86pKQEFWG9kwmWAuR/VIke6C+6EiJV/afQo9WM0HVFW4sIZ4dy6UJuk6TwgqtHzB bS9tNAgx6k5XOOXV5yN26kh2v1FoLT8T6I6S3JPg6uCRgEVyrj6nhD+YPLj1lZyw 9pzo3jMKnNR98ROsz+TBg9yPGuvfl7vUnIayW0y5KtWi/NqoLpqnECnpA7ZfY+ln CWqLt6NtcnFlKMvKQ9W25mOPXBOvm6A0WFAr45njIbxYs0qOeNaV0nF0Qly3qT1Y 4MROsTlrXi++ye1w22LMODWspx5FBmLXQXRM0oyo0fwgV0orOyvBhBEyDji34aZ+ jc4ajXQINcE1pEA2bpxiWOwqutKKm8GZlsPj6ClDMLq/Eq5/W1Otv0i5qbj2ZNmb SI+Q4BsC7qKLyftPjwA0tzTBlQ8qUikdmydgwwXnmlHILgYm9y08kmwStmOYlqVq COYwyMMWYVQrevWmJ0Ma1Vj+hlMIIEdQiNqVTswBLtxkru4TLvU= =HdJd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --b36UU2ifwS1xeww6--