Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tzNRr-001GFU-7d for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 31 Mar 2025 22:17:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tzNRp-00DQBF-Vi for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 31 Mar 2025 22:17:37 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tzNRp-00DQB6-M2 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 31 Mar 2025 22:17:37 +0000 Received: from mout-p-202.mailbox.org ([80.241.56.172]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1tzNRn-002OG3-0x for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 31 Mar 2025 22:17:37 +0000 Received: from smtp102.mailbox.org (smtp102.mailbox.org [10.196.197.102]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-202.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ZRQVN6k4Hz9tY6; Tue, 1 Apr 2025 00:17:32 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2025 00:17:31 +0200 From: Christoph Berg To: Daniel Gustafsson , Jacob Champion , Thomas Munro Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: pgsql: Add support for OAUTHBEARER SASL mechanism Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Re: To Daniel Gustafsson > > Add support for OAUTHBEARER SASL mechanism > > Debian still has this experimental port with a GNU userland and a > FreeBSD kernel called kfreebsd. Sorry this part was nonsense, kfreebsd was actually terminated and obviously I didn't even read the port's name. The failing port (still experimental and care-is-optional) is hurd-amd64. The bug is the same, though. Christoph