Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 16:01:59 -0500
From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>,
	Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>,
	pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Introduce hash_search_with_hash_value() function
Message-ID: <Zr5sx2FnIoQsI6X4@nathan>
References: 
 <CA+TgmoaxUist2vuFZ6ofzDcuNcuxVgvN0p3-WYthw9zxyDrqPQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <202408071708.x3p2fbmwyb2u@alvherre.pgsql>
 <ZrOrp-8TU_FtHA6D@nathan>
 <CA+Tgmoa+PkfF0YqFe46V1n3vszD-EuFbf5GeS285cMW85cE=6g@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: 
 <CA+Tgmoa+PkfF0YqFe46V1n3vszD-EuFbf5GeS285cMW85cE=6g@mail.gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/Zr5sx2FnIoQsI6X4%40nathan>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 02:01:30PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> Also, for the notes to be useful, we'd probably need some conventions
> about how we, as a project, want to use them. If everyone does
> something different, the result isn't likely to be all that great.

What did you have in mind?  Would it be sufficient to propose a template
that, once ratified, would be available in the committing checklist [0]?

[0] https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Committing_checklist

-- 
nathan