Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uLvvf-003FZz-7T for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2025 03:33:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uLvvd-006rhk-Ow for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2025 03:33:37 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uLvvd-006rhc-FW for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2025 03:33:37 +0000 Received: from fout-a1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([103.168.172.144]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1uLvva-0017vU-1n for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2025 03:33:36 +0000 Received: from phl-compute-11.internal (phl-compute-11.phl.internal [10.202.2.51]) by mailfout.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B25A13802B2; Sun, 1 Jun 2025 23:33:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-mailfrontend-02 ([10.202.2.163]) by phl-compute-11.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 01 Jun 2025 23:33:33 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=paquier.xyz; h= cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1748835213; x=1748921613; bh=bcNFv0n0XP qGDXw7T7imnLomtfhMWE74P+V9toA9HGU=; b=uH54+FdNko+PTBsuYdqHdRJJPe xot5oo2ru48SNDMHGyjRodxi6vefG5u6kynyCxxGITt3KlGjMtcUngofkJ+ZMp8A TVyjaAIdeixMZagS/UxYlkaQiKSIx4b9qTbnooofOgrfp0QUvu2FWrJwaTMOShYH Jan4FHFlfLgLJ4ZSsrwBHwhKoYmpH/TiGAvYQma7AdoORG81UwUXyNBDpbmpO22s CwBuFKfJF990xbXW8L63nzxCJ2YJ9qapB1w5UdWZRs+y5DVVe8I+M5jgMSc5CPme JDAdaIRqUlcs0FLfAwP9T8ivGDAs05joK1w/+J6oonSVTjXTqYo6lirujVrw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t= 1748835213; x=1748921613; bh=bcNFv0n0XPqGDXw7T7imnLomtfhMWE74P+V 9toA9HGU=; b=OUAVCjvFbwrfAb6whbJmPUAB3XbnzDl3lZh3YYNnSFVpvUXtExb bLnXz1hj3d2LoFSPDSv8+xbwIdZKuRw3dI5EGqEc3jyoXGSYznX8JpFG/3soCFP/ ncVhKzdUSvcHfXhst8mpqmQDWFcSE3cgnOvvLFjdjdQZhioOefew500+KfO0rQeG KONjCJ1F84nuDWmdd7nSqN5HVf56N565Ol6kfhEKxo/TYwl4dkOuHqfhpAaU3SIH nmWMzZ4vU29GWHy0nvgl3eRRPdctTvb5J/PQBaa40XRAbhiXKN4a1e43/AFv12VD q0FsYbggAyu8hRfzJNkWRto7fCyVnXp+IxQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeffedrtddtgdefieeitdculddtuddrgeefvddrtd dtmdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpggft fghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftd dtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenfghrlhcuvffnffculdejtddm necujfgurhepfffhvfevuffkfhggtggujgesghdtreertddtvdenucfhrhhomhepofhitg hhrggvlhcurfgrqhhuihgvrhcuoehmihgthhgrvghlsehprghquhhivghrrdighiiiqeen ucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeetleeifedufffhhfdtteelgeeggeffhfekueevteeigfduud evudetgfegiedvjeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhl fhhrohhmpehmihgthhgrvghlsehprghquhhivghrrdighiiipdhnsggprhgtphhtthhope efpdhmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopehmrghsrghordhfuhhjihhiseho shhsrdhnthhtuggrthgrrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepvghfuhhjihhtrgesphhoshhtgh hrvghsqhhlrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtohepphhgshhqlhdqhhgrtghkvghrsheslhhishht shdrphhoshhtghhrvghsqhhlrdhorhhg X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i0fe9450f:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sun, 1 Jun 2025 23:33:31 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2025 12:33:23 +0900 From: Michael Paquier To: Fujii Masao Cc: Etsuro Fujita , pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: pgsql: postgres_fdw: Inherit the local transaction's access/deferrable Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VR/8pMnqcNjeAycl" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk --VR/8pMnqcNjeAycl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Jun 02, 2025 at 12:03:50PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote: > I'm not sure this change should be considered a bug fix, > since the current behavior of postgres_fdw with a local read-only > transaction isn't clearly documented. Some users might see this > as a behavioral change rather than a fix. Anyway if we go with it, > shouldn't we document the change in the v18 release notes? After going through the thread and the commit, I have to admit that I was surprised to see this applied on HEAD now that we are in feature freeze. This is a behavior change. Perhaps this could be done once v19 happens, still it's rather unclear if the new behavior is better than the previous one. -- Michael --VR/8pMnqcNjeAycl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEG72nH6vTowiyblFKnvQgOdbyQH0FAmg9G4MACgkQnvQgOdby QH0Idw//dNaxrnZMq+BzeP3zCxY79Yd7YX4IIdvx6EDeZzRefON7/h8lTp03gM4D vlgAVeMGQcSdJTUKwoQiGL5oMkT6uxiOMtexyceYtkhwSiMTXfYcS+BdiwLzntiY 72bUH5VydV85qWfKdeM+KmbdEY1rS9p7C0+gbfzZqMLw6uQnjy++qGFzYG0jFljE YNyKGH41GsypCAFW8uA/o1X/lvV6epXWCKapQq+71jQRHMN8J3NjV0IAgWjTb3dA CL1jDmv+nNfWCs4mm3rTAFuIHRbFF9Xi7Gs97/l9BJzxTKlpF6qgimZsn2dQ9cz6 938IhGnwaDBqD1z0sH//FuguuCWcrVTfUz5l+v84qn2gE2i7fnX93hgrnEixKhFV D+oGuA5GQ62hxqDGABH3F742qqmci/6EwqJxmwlVmbd75B3XRMttle+Z2qJfWUGq qQN8qG2GAZMNxOo8CXs+LctPq1RrKdSMSfn0DH+hzhy24kqkoBsL8Sn+E3dNFx+i AoVV+SEccu3uoMsQFBImmdUV94fwyrbTCKFY41vB2xgAMB+LzGguRpXnxpgoQXaq De+CJps4cJKh0PMeaqKZgH1CddNb3NO19xuZg3AmjqGX1UTdbsUQLovWSV83aHg5 kWO3U57y/pQnxBaMV2k0qnyLfrGdbsmaw4xO7GXByqzolx/i+Ao= =N5w2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VR/8pMnqcNjeAycl--