References: <1869181647.1627666.1436519928292.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
 <1193014386.1618270.1436520011274.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
From: Tair Sabirgaliev <tair.sabirgaliev@bee.kz>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <1193014386.1618270.1436520011274.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 15:32:53 +0600
Message-ID: <-162662413275571340@unknownmsgid>
Subject: Re: typo in synchronous_commit description
To: amul sul <sul_amul@yahoo.co.in>
Cc: "pgsql-docs@postgresql.org" <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-docs-owner@postgresql.org

No, the text is correct. When synchronous_commit=3Doff there is a
possible delay between 'reported' transaction success and factual
saving on disk

Sent from my iPhone

> On 10 =D0=B8=D1=8E=D0=BB=D1=8F 2015 =D0=B3., at 15:20, amul sul <sul_amul=
@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> synchronous_commit description in document[1] :
> When off, there can be a delay between when success is reported to the cl=
ient and when the transaction is really guaranteed to be safe against a ser=
ver crash.
>
>
>
> If I am not misunderstood, I guess it should be *When on*  instead of *Wh=
en off* here?
>
>
>
> [1] Doc link : http://www.postgresql.org/docs/<9.5,9.4,9.3,9.2,9.1,9.0,8.=
4>/static/runtime-config-wal.html#GUC-SYNCHRONOUS-COMMIT
>
>
> Regards,
> Amul Sul
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs


--=20
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs