Received: from www.networksgy.com ([208.153.97.7]) by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA91423 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 13:04:26 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from dvfung@networksgy.com) Received: from epantsvr ([208.153.97.41]) by www.networksgy.com (8.9.0/8.9.0) with SMTP id MAA22452 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 12:58:44 +0300 (GMT) Message-ID: <000801bf0901$5da70f30$aabebebe@epa.org> From: "Daniel Fung" To: Subject: Getting Postgres Info Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 12:59:55 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0005_01BF08E8.327422D0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01BF08E8.327422D0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, where is the long awaited NT version of the PostgreSQL system? Hiya, I am using Access97/ODBC/NT Server to PostgreSQL 6.4/Linux 6.0 = fine. How do you guys compare easy of use/learning of POSTGRESQL versus MS SQL = Server. Daniel ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01BF08E8.327422D0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello, where is the long awaited NT = version of the=20 PostgreSQL system?

Hiya, I am using Access97/ODBC/NT = Server to=20 PostgreSQL 6.4/Linux 6.0 fine.

How do you guys compare easy of = use/learning of=20 POSTGRESQL versus MS SQL Server.

Daniel

------=_NextPart_000_0005_01BF08E8.327422D0--