X-Original-To: pgsql-advocacy-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [64.117.224.193])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id A4BAB30F7D4; Tue, 24 Jun 2003 13:53:58 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([64.117.224.193])
	by localhost (svr1.postgresql.org [64.117.224.193]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 13799-06; Tue, 24 Jun 2003 10:53:48 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from mailhost3.tudelft.nl (mailhost3.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.83])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6B7A530F937; Tue, 24 Jun 2003 10:53:45 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by rav.antivirus (Postfix) with SMTP
	id D663A4A5; Tue, 24 Jun 2003 15:53:45 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from listserv.tudelft.nl (listserv.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.33])
	by mailhost3.tudelft.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 238EC472; Tue, 24 Jun 2003 15:53:45 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from acm (x193056-2.shuis-s.tudelft.nl [145.94.193.58])
	by listserv.tudelft.nl (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h5ODrZDb015006;
	Tue, 24 Jun 2003 15:53:44 +0200 (MEST)
From: "Arjen van der Meijden" <acm@tweakers.net>
To: "'Jan Wieck'" <JanWieck@Yahoo.com>, <nolan@celery.tssi.com>
Cc: "'Advocacy PostgreSQL'" <pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org>,
	"'PostgreSQL-general'" <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Documentation quality WAS: interesting
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 15:53:40 +0200
Message-ID: <001a01c33a58$08276b40$3ac15e91@acm>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
In-Reply-To: <3EF8523C.4000709@Yahoo.com>
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Importance: Normal
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0
	tests=FORGED_RCVD_TRAIL, IN_REP_TO, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200306/239
X-Sequence-Number: 1451

> Jan Wieck wrote:
> If you work on Unix systems remotely on a regular base, you 
> should have 
> a Unix system as a workstation too. That way you can use ssh(1) to 
> forward your X11 connections through a secure channel.
> 
> A "second" PC can be implemented as a memory+disk upgrade 
> together with 
> a VMware license.

There also ssh clients which support X11 forwarding on a windows machine
and since there are X11 servers for windows...
You don't necessarily need a unix workstation. Apart from that, a
(tight)vnc server might be less bandwidth consuming.

Arjen