Received: from mail.com-stock.com (mail.com-stock.com [204.255.137.254]) by mail.postgresql.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f03Cnf777993 for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 07:49:41 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from gregw@com-stock.com) Received: from deimos (deimos.com-stock.com [204.255.137.120]) by mail.com-stock.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id HAA26707 for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 07:53:17 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <003601c07583$f7c0ff00$7889ffcc@comstock.com> From: "Gregory Wood" To: "PostgreSQL-General" References: Subject: Re: RE: Re: MySQL and PostgreSQL speed compare Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2001 07:51:59 -0500 Organization: Comstock Net Services MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 X-Archive-Number: 200101/66 X-Sequence-Number: 2232 > Then it goes right back to what someone else eluded to... If you don't > like what you see in the documentation, contribute. Send in diffs, or > even new items. If you don't know what's needed go to the DOCS list and > ask. Getting people to help with documentation for ANY project is like > pulling teeth. Finding people to criticize existing documentation is > quite easy. What a horrible chicken and egg scenario... you can't help with providing documentation until you have some deal of experience with something, but if you ask for better documentation to get that experience, you are told to write some. I understand the frustration, but at the same time, please understand the frustration of those trying to learn. Personally I find the documentation is more than adequate, but could always be improved. Hopefully I will learn enough at some point to be able to say that I'm ready to contribute... until then I'll be here feeding off the scraps of knowledge that are dribbled here and there... Greg