Received: from smtp1.sentex.ca (smtp1.sentex.ca [199.212.134.4]) by mail.postgresql.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f1GKRrx57290 for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 15:27:53 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from Dave@micro-automation.net) Received: from granite.sentex.net (granite-atm.sentex.ca [209.112.4.1]) by smtp1.sentex.ca (8.11.2/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f1GKRl914787; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 15:27:47 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from Dave@micro-automation.net) Received: from thebigone (dc.sentex.ca [64.7.135.31]) by granite.sentex.net (8.8.8/8.6.9) with SMTP id PAA07805; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 15:27:46 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <00f701c09857$140c48e0$1f870740@thebigone> From: "Dave Cramer" To: "Richard" , References: <20010216174055.24388.qmail@web6401.mail.yahoo.com> Subject: Re: Annotatable on-line documentation Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 15:28:53 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-Archive-Number: 200102/825 X-Sequence-Number: 4729 You should have a look at the wiki stuff http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?WikiWikiWeb Dave ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard" To: Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 12:40 PM Subject: [GENERAL] Annotatable on-line documentation > (This was: "Re: [GENERAL] Re: PostgreSQL vs Oracle vs > DB2 vs MySQL - Which should I use?", but I think a new > thread has spun off...) > > [Tom Lane said ...] > > I agree we need to work harder on making answers > findable > > outside the mailing lists. Improving the docs, > making the mail archives > > more easily searchable, etc etc. I dunno if an > "annotated manual" would > > help --- I've never used one --- but if people want > to try one, it can't hurt. > > [... to which Bruce Momjian added ...] > > I will say that the FAQ and my book have visibly > reduced the number of > > questions. When I put something on the FAQ, the > questions about that > > topic just magically go away. > > I have not used an annotated document either. > However, I could see such a beast being used in the > development of the documentation in a way that is not > dissimilar to the development of the product itself. > That is, I see an annotatable set of documentation as > similar in nature to the developmental version of the > product. After some period of development, some lucky > editor(s) would fold the annotations into the document > proper, periodically releasing the "stable" version of > the docs. > > Would this lighten the work load on the folk that are > currently maintaining the docs? Would it lighten the > work load for the core developers? Would it stimulate > the development of richer documetation? Would it draw > some of the load off the mailing lists? > > A pilot project may be enlightening. Anyone have > experience with setting up/maintaining annotatable > on-line documentation? > > Cheers, > Richard Blackwell > Programmer/Analyst > Simon Fraser University > Burnaby, BC Canada > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 > a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ > >