From: "Robert B. Easter" <reaster@comptechnews.com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Subject: Re: docs: syntax.sgml patch
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2001 21:00:40 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="US-ASCII"
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>, <pgsql-patches@postgresql.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0101212311530.757-100000@peter.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0101212311530.757-100000@peter.localdomain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <01012121004003.08820@comptechnews>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Thanks for getting some of the table expressions into the docs.  I think it 
will be helpful to people.  I'll see what I can do with the GROUP BY and 
HAVING clauses, unless you beat me to it!  Thanks again.


On Sunday 21 January 2001 17:14, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I've checked this in, or at least I used it as the starting point for what
> I did.  The GROUP BY and ORDER BY explanations seemed really complicated,
> so I disabled them for now.  They need to be made simpler, and an example
> would be nice.  Essentially, this section is now the description of the
> SELECT command; maybe it should be named like that, too.
>
> Robert B. Easter writes:
> > I worked on the ORDER BY paragraphs some more. See what you think of it
> > now. The patch is attached. :)
> >
> > On Thursday 18 January 2001 18:48, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > Bruce Momjian writes:
> > > > I know this SQL Guide has been discussed, but what should be done
> > > > with this patch?
> > >
> > > I believe he's going to revise it to address Tom Lane's suggestions.

-- 
-------- Robert B. Easter  reaster@comptechnews.com ---------
-- CompTechNews Message Board http://www.comptechnews.com/ --
-- CompTechServ Tech Services http://www.comptechserv.com/ --
---------- http://www.comptechnews.com/~reaster/ ------------