public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Bjoern Metzdorf <[email protected]>
To: Postgresql Performance <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2003 18:22:43 +0200
Message-ID: <026d01c34248$83f313d0$0564a8c0@shock> (raw)
References: <000301c34246$d3aadcc0$01000001@trouble>
> I'm not saying (and never did say) that postgres could not be fast.
> All I ever said was that with the same minimal effort applied to both
> DBs, postgres was slower.
Afaik, your original posting said postgresql was 3 times slower than mysql
and that you are going to leave this list now. This implied that you have
made your decision between postgresql and mysql, taking mysql because it is
faster.
Now you say your testing setup has minimal effort applied. Well, it is not
very surprising that mysql is faster in standard configurations. As Shridhar
pointed out, postgresql has very conservative default values, so that it
starts on nearly every machine.
If I was your client and gave you the task to choose a suitable database for
my application and you evaluated suitable databases this way, then something
is seriously wrong with your work.
Regards,
Bjoern
view thread (66+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL
In-Reply-To: <026d01c34248$83f313d0$0564a8c0@shock>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox