X-Original-To: pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@postgresql.org Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E8019FB2DF; Thu, 3 Aug 2006 22:05:49 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 85374-01; Thu, 3 Aug 2006 22:05:48 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from grzm.com (grzm.com [200.46.204.98]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE4279FB205; Thu, 3 Aug 2006 22:05:48 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.208.251]) by grzm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54D99127DFC0; Fri, 4 Aug 2006 02:05:43 +0100 (BST) Received: from grzm.com ([200.46.204.98]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 83202-07; Thu, 3 Aug 2006 22:05:43 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [172.16.1.101] (unknown [61.197.227.146]) by grzm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E9E0127CE83; Fri, 4 Aug 2006 02:05:36 +0100 (BST) In-Reply-To: References: <44B69778.5050104@dunslane.net> <44B7ADFC.90205@dunslane.net> <44BC0432.3040509@joeconway.com> <44BC661F.80609@joeconway.com> <44CFFD2D.8040906@joeconway.com> <18685.1154617090@sss.pgh.pa.us> <429A0065-78C7-48C9-B2DC-E898988F93E6@seespotcode.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <0C6AD0FD-2D94-4916-943A-8A1D8C49816B@seespotcode.net> Cc: Tom Lane , Joe Conway , pgsql-patches@postgresql.org, pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Michael Glaesemann Subject: Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re: [PATCHES] Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 10:05:39 +0900 To: Gavin Sherry X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.09 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200608/7 X-Sequence-Number: 3625 On Aug 4, 2006, at 9:42 , Gavin Sherry wrote: > ... with update? I associate it very closely with INSERT. After all, > INSERT is the only statement where we've had VALUES as part of the > grammar. Of course! Thanks for catching the glitch. I must have a bad RAM chip. Michael Glaesemann grzm seespotcode net