Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iZxqj-00071y-UO for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 13:59:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iZxqi-0000eB-Mf for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 13:59:20 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iZxqi-0000e3-6y for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 13:59:20 +0000 Received: from smtp2.outgoing.loopia.se ([93.188.3.37]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iZxqa-00057M-EO for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 13:59:18 +0000 Received: from s807.loopia.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by s807.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id E995C2E4C1E8 for ; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 14:59:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from s498.loopia.se (unknown [172.22.191.5]) by s807.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAD892E295DC; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 14:59:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from s472.loopia.se (unknown [172.22.191.6]) by s498.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id C67104707CD; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 14:59:08 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amavis.loopia.se X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1 tagged_above=-999 required=6.2 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1] autolearn=disabled Received: from s500.loopia.se ([172.22.191.5]) by s472.loopia.se (s472.loopia.se [172.22.190.12]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id EhH9O9J7vJsE; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 14:59:08 +0100 (CET) X-Loopia-Auth: user X-Loopia-User: daniel@yesql.se X-Loopia-Originating-IP: 89.255.232.193 Received: from [192.168.72.43] (customer-89-255-232-193.stosn.net [89.255.232.193]) (Authenticated sender: daniel@yesql.se) by s500.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 36B2D1E146C2; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 14:59:08 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\)) Subject: Re: Example not producing shown output From: Daniel Gustafsson In-Reply-To: <20191126182818.GC4161@alvherre.pgsql> Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 14:59:07 +0100 Cc: miodrag.milic@gmail.com, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <0F6D5192-31DE-4BB0-9FF1-F8BC268C10AE@yesql.se> References: <157468351705.7229.6629196528495737297@wrigleys.postgresql.org> <21BF1412-3E64-4F10-8F8E-74AD0EC3AAC3@yesql.se> <20191126182818.GC4161@alvherre.pgsql> To: Alvaro Herrera X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk > On 26 Nov 2019, at 19:28, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Or perhaps we can add a second line in the example cell for the > @@ operator, to make it clear that both forms can be used. Users can be > expected to apply some intuition from that point onwards. Wouldn't it be more intuitive to add such a second line under to_tsvector, or expand the Description field to cover a brief discussion covering this? cheers ./daniel