From 3685b2ce9d921857d629bd20d49b1acfd5f01576 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Laurenz Albe Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 12:01:37 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v1] Document effects of ownership change on privileges Privileges have always been transferred along with the ownership, but it is a good idea to document that. Per complaint by Gilles Parc. Author: Laurenz Albe Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson, David G. Johnston Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2023185982.281851219.1646733038464.JavaMail.root%40zimbra15-e2.priv.proxad.net --- doc/src/sgml/ddl.sgml | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/ddl.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/ddl.sgml index fc03a349f0..835ebd5a67 100644 --- a/doc/src/sgml/ddl.sgml +++ b/doc/src/sgml/ddl.sgml @@ -1893,6 +1893,8 @@ ALTER TABLE table_name OWNER TO new_owne Superusers can always do this; ordinary roles can only do it if they are both the current owner of the object (or inherit the privileges of the owning role) and able to SET ROLE to the new owning role. + All object privileges of the old owner are transferred to the new owner + along with the ownership. -- 2.43.0