To: Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>
cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>,
	Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>,
	pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: CVS in docs 
In-reply-to: <4C9A622A.7030404@2ndquadrant.com> 
References: <AANLkTimJVWSegpzD7ywO8S6AHfg8doQOVXQDem6xhkhc@mail.gmail.com>
	<10904.1285108697@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<AANLkTi=K+NS7g5g=Z++eheA2A+5uLEPTmLsBq8ULGukA@mail.gmail.com>
	<26043.1285169700@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<AANLkTimSMgvG_zgDyD3mc68g0sR6jzySo_wbRUHf=u=u@mail.gmail.com>
	<1285177724-sup-6812@alvh.no-ip.org>
	<4C9A622A.7030404@2ndquadrant.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>
	message dated "Wed, 22 Sep 2010 16:08:10 -0400"
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 16:17:20 -0400
Message-ID: <1015.1285186640@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> BTW now that they are pestered with the PgFoundry commit messages, the
>> pgsql-committers archive do not seem a very useful resource anymore.
>> The Git "shortlog" seems much better, so maybe we should point to that.

> I missed why that happened in the first place, but based on being a 
> subscriber isn't that something that should be split onto another list 
> regardless?

IIRC, it was essentially a political decision, meant to help make
pgfoundry authors feel more like a part of the core project.  Personally
I filter the non-core commits separately anyway...

			regards, tom lane