Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A9DE47697D for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 15:33:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from squire.barchord.com (squire.barchord.com [216.194.67.18]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A52747697C for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 15:33:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [10.0.2.69] (nat.inquent.com [216.6.14.45]) by squire.barchord.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DA2232C; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 15:33:09 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: Documentation DTD From: Rod Taylor To: Peter Eisentraut Cc: PostgreSQL-development In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 Date: 15 Aug 2002 15:33:11 -0400 Message-Id: <1029439992.18448.104.camel@jester> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517 X-Archive-Number: 200208/1195 X-Sequence-Number: 26879 > > Yes, after updating docs to the newer DTD I intend to make them XML > > compliant to ensure they work with v5 of docbook in the future. > > Ah, an XML vs. SGML debate. I look forward to it. This one is pretty simple. It's been announced that the docbook group isn't looking to continue with SGML. This is shown on the oasis-open pages as well as their discussion in the mailing lists (xsltproc and fop rather than jade and dsssl). I prefer working with SGML, but not enough to try hacking away at openjade to finish it off :) Anyway, you're right about the patch. Lets apply it to the 7.4 tree after branching.