From: Rod Taylor <rbt@zort.ca>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Documentation DTD
Date: 17 Aug 2002 13:56:03 -0400
Message-ID: <1029606964.29972.25.camel@jester> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0208171329040.2335-100000@localhost.localdomain>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0208171329040.2335-100000@localhost.localdomain>
On Sat, 2002-08-17 at 11:47, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Rod Taylor writes:
>
> > This one is pretty simple. It's been announced that the docbook group
> > isn't looking to continue with SGML.
>
> I don't know where you got this from, but it's not true. DocBook 5 will
> support SGML. And as long as they publish DTDs you can use them with SGML
> tools anyway.
Yes, jade and friends will work. But Fop is quickly catching up to the
dsssl abilities and can already do some things much cleaner (title
pages, headers and footers).
Anyway, XML or SGML doesn't really matter. There are a number of
enhancements I'd like to make to the doc process which won't be affected
either way. Auto-generated example output, and others to help things
stay in sync.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: rbt@zort.ca, peter_e@gmx.net
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Documentation DTD
In-Reply-To: <1029606964.29972.25.camel@jester>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox