Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA178475FCF
	for <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>; Sat,  7 Sep 2002 15:30:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from squire.barchord.com (squire.barchord.com [216.194.67.18])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5836D475B67
	for <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>; Sat,  7 Sep 2002 15:30:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.253]
	(CPE00508b028d7d-CM00803785c5e0.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com
	[24.103.51.175])
	by squire.barchord.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1B7B399
	for <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>; Sat,  7 Sep 2002 15:30:54 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: RESTRICT / CASCADE
From: Rod Taylor <rbt@zort.ca>
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 
Date: 07 Sep 2002 15:30:50 -0400
Message-Id: <1031427051.15580.11.camel@jester>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517
X-Archive-Number: 200209/23
X-Sequence-Number: 1475

This note is currently in the 'Dependency Tracking (2.8)' section:

Note:  According to the SQL standard, specifying either RESTRICT or
CASCADE is required. No database system actually implements it that way,
but the defaults might be different. 


If the defaults are different, perhaps the documentation should show
it's examples using RESTRICT or CASCADE explicitly?