Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.132.154])
	by mail.postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2NM8Qw75345
	for <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 17:08:26 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f2NM8Hw10556;
	Fri, 23 Mar 2001 17:08:18 -0500 (EST)
To: Roberto Mello <rmello@cc.usu.edu>
cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: plsql.sgml patch 
In-reply-to: <20010323073542.A11008@cc.usu.edu> 
References: <20010323073542.A11008@cc.usu.edu>
Comments: In-reply-to Roberto Mello <rmello@cc.usu.edu>
	message dated "Fri, 23 Mar 2001 07:35:42 -0700"
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 17:08:17 -0500
Message-ID: <10553.985385297@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Archive-Number: 200103/118
X-Sequence-Number: 552

Roberto Mello <rmello@cc.usu.edu> writes:
> 	I sent a patch to plsql.sgml to Peter a four days ago and the
> message is bouncing, so I am sending this to the list. The patch corrects 
> a bug in my instr function and has the third instr function in PL/pgSQL 
> instead of PL/Tcl.

Applied.  Thanks.

			regards, tom lane