Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL
From: Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca>
To: shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in
Cc: Postgresql Performance <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
In-Reply-To: <3F05CC6B.23813.161542@localhost>
References: <200307041823.40101.shridhar_daithankar@nospam.persistent.co.in>
	<3F05CC6B.23813.161542@localhost>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="=-gNH/x6zMW9mEgU1zHYZ2"
Message-Id: <1057326329.40425.1.camel@jester>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: 04 Jul 2003 09:45:30 -0400

--=-gNH/x6zMW9mEgU1zHYZ2
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, 2003-07-04 at 09:20, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> On 4 Jul 2003 at 9:11, Rod Taylor wrote:
>=20
> > > Unless you provide these, it's difficult to help..
> >=20
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2003-05/msg00299.php
>=20
> Well, even in that thread there wasn't enough information I asked for in =
other=20
> mail. It was bit too vague to be a comfortable DB tuning problem.

Completely too little information, and it stopped with Tom asking for
additional information. I don't think Brian has any interest in being
helped. Many here would be more than happy to do so if the information
were to flow.

--=-gNH/x6zMW9mEgU1zHYZ2
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQA/BYT56DETLow6vwwRAnCRAJ9l9HdfZkPlwGsPJVaefbXEWMHIMQCfaQRx
wL/32ZHzVug8JLMxLykf79g=
=CtXl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-gNH/x6zMW9mEgU1zHYZ2--