Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (unknown [192.204.191.242])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CB05475D87
	for <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>; Thu,  7 Mar 2002 11:51:33 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id g27GpYS10607;
	Thu, 7 Mar 2002 11:51:34 -0500 (EST)
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL TO-DO List (fwd) 
In-reply-to: <200203040255.g242tto08892@candle.pha.pa.us> 
References: <200203040255.g242tto08892@candle.pha.pa.us>
Comments: In-reply-to Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
	message dated "Sun, 03 Mar 2002 21:55:55 -0500"
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2002 11:51:34 -0500
Message-ID: <10604.1015519894@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Archive-Number: 200203/20
X-Sequence-Number: 1301

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Can someone comment on this?  I don't understand it.

He's complaining that a whole-row reference to NEW doesn't work
in a plpgsql trigger.  He's right.

			regards, tom lane