Subject: Re: 7.4 official docs : Fonts?
From: Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
To: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Cc: elein <elein@varlena.com>, pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
In-Reply-To: <200311191210.34227.josh@agliodbs.com>
References: <20031117210340.F5963@cookie.varlena.com>
	<200311191210.34227.josh@agliodbs.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: 19 Nov 2003 17:20:15 -0500
Message-Id: <1069280415.10335.9734.camel@camel>
Mime-Version: 1.0

On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 15:10, Josh Berkus wrote:
> People,
> 
> > of varied sizes. The usage for different types
> > of objects seems to be fairly consistent,
> > however, the varied sizes of the different fonts
> > make things very hard to read.
> 
> Elein is correct, our variety of styles does look odd and can cause issues 
> with readability.    See, for example, 
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/functions-string.html
> 
> Can we experiment with different SGML-to-HMTL font styles to find one that's a 
> little easier on the eyes?   What I find particularly difficult are the 
> function parameter columns; the mix of "normal" italics with "bold" italics.
> 
> Comments?  Responses?
> 

Whatever we had in 7.3 we should switch back to:

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.3/static/functions-string.html


Robert Treat
-- 
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL