X-Original-To: pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9606FDA664 for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 19:11:08 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 63806-08 for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 22:11:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0821D701B for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 19:10:44 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j9GMAc4g010773; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 18:10:38 -0400 (EDT) To: Volkan YAZICI Cc: Bruce Momjian , pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Will PQregisterThreadLock() be documented? In-reply-to: <7104a7370510161230s4e34438fpce0dfc2c5c48538f@mail.gmail.com> References: <9101.1129485149@sss.pgh.pa.us> <200510161821.j9GILVO29383@candle.pha.pa.us> <7104a7370510161230s4e34438fpce0dfc2c5c48538f@mail.gmail.com> Comments: In-reply-to Volkan YAZICI message dated "Sun, 16 Oct 2005 22:30:29 +0300" Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 18:10:38 -0400 Message-ID: <10772.1129500638@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.006 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.006] X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200510/50 X-Sequence-Number: 3295 Volkan YAZICI writes: > Revision 1.269: Wed Mar 24 03:44:59 2004 UTC by momjian > Branches: MAIN > ] Add thread locking to SSL and Kerberos connections. > ] > ] I have removed the docs mentioning that SSL and Kerberos are not > ] thread-safe. > ] > ] Manfred Spraul I note that PQinitSSL is likewise documentation-free. Also, neither one of these two routines is listed in exports.txt, meaning that Windows users are physically unable to call them even if they knew they existed :-( regards, tom lane