X-Original-To: pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67E959DC835;
	Mon, 26 Dec 2005 14:44:18 -0400 (AST)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 05624-08; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 14:44:18 -0400 (AST)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A6AE9DC804;
	Mon, 26 Dec 2005 14:44:16 -0400 (AST)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jBQIiGk1010948;
	Mon, 26 Dec 2005 13:44:16 -0500 (EST)
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
	PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Online backup vs Continuous backup 
In-reply-to: <200512261755.jBQHt5L21116@candle.pha.pa.us> 
References: <200512261755.jBQHt5L21116@candle.pha.pa.us>
Comments: In-reply-to Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
	message dated "Mon, 26 Dec 2005 12:55:05 -0500"
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 13:44:15 -0500
Message-ID: <10947.1135622655@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.045 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.045]
X-Spam-Score: 0.045
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200512/29
X-Sequence-Number: 3377

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> I suggest the following patch to rename our capability "Continuous
> Backup".

This doesn't seem like an improvement.  "Online backup" is the standard
terminology AFAIK.

			regards, tom lane