public inbox for [email protected]  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Mischa Sandberg <[email protected]>
To: Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
Cc: Joshua D. Drake <[email protected]>
Cc: Jeff Davis <[email protected]>
Cc: Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>
Cc: Robert Treat <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL-documentation <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove replicaiton FAQ item.
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 16:15:06 -0700
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>

Quoting Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>: 
 
> Joshua D. Drake wrote: 
> > Jeff Davis wrote: 
> > > Should the text include a mention of synchronous vs. 
> asynchronous? Or 
> > > does master-master imply synchronous? 
> >  
> > It shouldn't. It is possible to have synchronous replication 
> without it 
> > being master<->master. 
>  
> We could mention async vs sync but at the FAQ stage I think the 
> multi-master/master-slave disinction is enough. Let's see what 
> questions 
> we get. 
 
About all you can say is, it is not possible to implement synchronous 
master-master replication, because of conflict resolution of 
simultaneous transactions. 
-- 
"Dreams come true, not free." -- S.Sondheim, ITW  

view thread (15+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove replicaiton FAQ item.
  In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox