Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.132.154])
	by mail.postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2KGUYN30835;
	Tue, 20 Mar 2001 11:30:34 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2KGULt11187;
	Tue, 20 Mar 2001 11:30:21 -0500 (EST)
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
cc: lockhart@fourpalms.org, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org,
	pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Re: src/test/regress/README duplicates SGML material 
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0103201717360.1639-100000@peter.localdomain> 
References: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0103201717360.1639-100000@peter.localdomain>
Comments: In-reply-to Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
	message dated "Tue, 20 Mar 2001 17:25:56 +0100"
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 11:30:20 -0500
Message-ID: <11184.985105820@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Archive-Number: 200103/104
X-Sequence-Number: 538

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> The regress README is also documented, but it involves manual labour.

I ended up just applying the same diffs to the README by hand, so it's
not an issue at the moment.

			regards, tom lane