Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 08:09:08 +0200
From: Pavlo Golub <pavlo.golub@cybertec.at>
Message-ID: <1124496168.20190124080908@cybertec.at>
To: "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>,
 Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>,
 Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>,
 Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
CC: Pg Docs <pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Bug reporting guidelines order of instructions
In-Reply-To: <3fab90b4-86ef-bc0a-9994-c8ebc501c5d8@postgresql.org>
References: <201901171429.sswhrrnhb2wk@alvherre.pgsql>
  <ad15fd10-c9d8-0f8f-e870-bfe8991479f7@joeconway.com>
  <3fab90b4-86ef-bc0a-9994-c8ebc501c5d8@postgresql.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Hello Jonathan,

Saturday, January 19, 2019, 7:02:17 PM, you wrote:

> On 1/18/19 4:06 PM, Joe Conway wrote:
>> On 1/17/19 9:29 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>> On 2019-Jan-17, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>>
>>>> Per the docs comment today, I will remove the notes about majordomo at
>>>> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/bug-reporting.html.
>>>>
>>>> However, this one also suggests email to the pgsql-bugs report as the
>>>> primary choice "and you can also use the bugs form. Do we perhaps want to
>>>> change the order of these and suggest the web form as the primary method,
>>>> since that hands out bug ids?
>>>
>>> +1.
>> 
>> +(many)

> +1, esp. based on the progress of this thread[1]

Yeap, good point! +1 from me

> Jonathan

> [1]
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20190114221809.eymqah36d6uq5nir%40alap3.anarazel.de


-- 
Best regards,
Pavlo Golub