X-Original-To: pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDD7ED9715 for ; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 16:49:38 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 99103-03 for ; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 19:49:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.nildram.co.uk (smtp.nildram.co.uk [195.112.4.54]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C024DD95E2 for ; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 16:49:36 -0300 (ADT) Received: from 192.168.0.3 (unknown [84.12.188.233]) by smtp.nildram.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 909F2251444; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 20:48:38 +0100 (BST) Subject: Re: Inheritance and Partitioning From: Simon Riggs To: Alvaro Herrera Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org In-Reply-To: <20051009135654.GA5640@surnet.cl> References: <1128848392.8300.205.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20051009135654.GA5640@surnet.cl> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: 2nd Quadrant Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2005 20:48:38 +0100 Message-Id: <1128887318.8300.212.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 (2.0.2-3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.048 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.002, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.05] X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200510/23 X-Sequence-Number: 3268 On Sun, 2005-10-09 at 10:56 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Simon Riggs wrote: > > I'm currently doing the docs for CE & Partitioning. > > > > The ddl.sgml chapter had a section on Inheritance. I'm expanding that > > section and splitting it into two: > > > > INHERITANCE & PARTITIONING > > 1. Table Partitioning > > Existing chapter, but with more detail of a general nature that > > will be important information when we discuss... > > > > 2. Basic Partitioning using Constraint Exclusion > > How to enhance inheritance with constraints to allow CE. How that > > works to provide basic partitioning, with examples and long list of > > caveats. > > Hmm, sorry, I missed most of the discussion on CE -- is it used only > in inheritance? Regrettably at this time. I couldn't find a clear point to put the code that would allow it to work cleanly for the UNION ALL case, at least in the time available. > Maybe you should add a separate section on > partitioning, referring to the inheritance section where appropiate. > But they are clearly not the same feature. > > Also, it will be more clearly separated as we add more partitioning > related features, right? OK. I'll keep the same flow, just promote both up a level. So there'll be two s for each concept. Best Regards, Simon Riggs