From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
cc: Zeyuan Hu <ferrishu3886@gmail.com>, pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Possible documentation inaccuracy in optimizer README
In-reply-to: 
 <CAApHDvoxSLCeQ=m35Je9L7VM_2cGKvxvRPwK0vihQzSyKzsJFA@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CACvHWmYFo+60yMqKJajDDvKN5EM41YHrCT3oxukwXmGAqpWvyw@mail.gmail.com>
 <3887651.1744086487@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CAApHDvpbJrzQC-gZk0XpxMbk5CW=zj+R5KajuhP=Hw7xSdL5VQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <111828.1744166032@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CAApHDvoxSLCeQ=m35Je9L7VM_2cGKvxvRPwK0vihQzSyKzsJFA@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
	message dated "Wed, 09 Apr 2025 14:36:57 +1200"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <115036.1744167894.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2025 23:04:54 -0400
Message-ID: <115037.1744167894@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/115037.1744167894%40sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, 9 Apr 2025 at 14:33, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Maybe better:
>> 
>> Other possibilities will be excluded for lack of join clauses.
>> (In reality, use of EquivalenceClasses would allow us to
>> deduce additional join clauses that allow more join
>> combinations, but here we ignore that to preserve the
>> simplicity of this example.)

> Looks good to me.

OK, done.  I moved the text after noticing that it really applies
to both of the examples here.

			regards, tom lane